<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Complicity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>A blog about Liberty, Equality and the Internet. But not necessarily at the same time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:33:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paddy Power advert approval withdrawn by Links round-up for International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia &#124; Edinburgh Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2012/02/paddy-power-advert-approval-withdrawn/comment-page-1/#comment-63053</link>
		<dc:creator>Links round-up for International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia &#124; Edinburgh Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=1976#comment-63053</guid>
		<description>[...] the real world: the Advertising Standards Authority have finally ruled that the Paddy Power “Ladies Day” advert breached their codes.  It had already had its clearance by Clearcast, a separate group who pre-vet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the real world: the Advertising Standards Authority have finally ruled that the Paddy Power “Ladies Day” advert breached their codes.  It had already had its clearance by Clearcast, a separate group who pre-vet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASA: Paddy Power advert seriously offensive, irresponsible and caused harm by Links round-up for International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia &#124; Edinburgh Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2012/05/asa-paddy-power-advert/comment-page-1/#comment-63052</link>
		<dc:creator>Links round-up for International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia &#124; Edinburgh Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=2207#comment-63052</guid>
		<description>[...] Archbishop Cranmer versus Advertising Standards Authority. This is turning out quite fun. *popcorn* In the real world: the Advertising Standards Authority have finally ruled that the Paddy Power “Ladies Day” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Archbishop Cranmer versus Advertising Standards Authority. This is turning out quite fun. *popcorn* In the real world: the Advertising Standards Authority have finally ruled that the Paddy Power “Ladies Day” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASA: Paddy Power advert seriously offensive, irresponsible and caused harm by Jennie Kermode</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2012/05/asa-paddy-power-advert/comment-page-1/#comment-62721</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie Kermode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 09:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=2207#comment-62721</guid>
		<description>We at Trans Media Watch are very pleased by this decision. We expect Paddy Power will welome the publicity but we hope people will remember their contempt for trans women - indeed, for all women - when choosing which betting shops they want to use in future. We also hope it will send a clear signal that transphobia is unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We at Trans Media Watch are very pleased by this decision. We expect Paddy Power will welome the publicity but we hope people will remember their contempt for trans women &#8211; indeed, for all women &#8211; when choosing which betting shops they want to use in future. We also hope it will send a clear signal that transphobia is unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trans Diagnosis 101: Leeds GIC show how not to do it by Transgender people and NHS Leeds &#171; Liberal Will</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2012/01/trans-diagnosis-101-leeds-gic-show-how-not-to-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-62678</link>
		<dc:creator>Transgender people and NHS Leeds &#171; Liberal Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=1884#comment-62678</guid>
		<description>[...] it were not for events at the Leeds GIC (Gender Identity Clinic): as Zoe O&#039;Connell has covered on her blog (twice), there seems to be a bit of a gap between the medical consensus on gender identity is and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it were not for events at the Leeds GIC (Gender Identity Clinic): as Zoe O&#039;Connell has covered on her blog (twice), there seems to be a bit of a gap between the medical consensus on gender identity is and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Hit and Miss&#8221;: Clue still required by Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2012/05/hit-and-miss-clue-still-required/comment-page-1/#comment-62607</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=2200#comment-62607</guid>
		<description>I for one would like to know why, after explicity looking for a pre-op transsexual woman to play the part, they then hired an American actress who isn&#039;t trans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one would like to know why, after explicity looking for a pre-op transsexual woman to play the part, they then hired an American actress who isn&#8217;t trans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Hit and Miss&#8221;: Clue still required by Big kate</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2012/05/hit-and-miss-clue-still-required/comment-page-1/#comment-62559</link>
		<dc:creator>Big kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=2200#comment-62559</guid>
		<description>ok so how many of us do you think are going to be contacting the BBC and complaining about the rampant transphobia shown 

If you don&#039;t mind i&#039;m going to stick up a link on my LJ and if it hasn&#039;t been already the TGUK Lj 

kate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok so how many of us do you think are going to be contacting the BBC and complaining about the rampant transphobia shown </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t mind i&#8217;m going to stick up a link on my LJ and if it hasn&#8217;t been already the TGUK Lj </p>
<p>kate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking Allowed on Transgender issues&#8230; by &#8220;Hit and Miss&#8221;: Clue still required &#171; Complicity</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2012/05/thinking-allowed-transgender/comment-page-1/#comment-62503</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Hit and Miss&#8221;: Clue still required &#171; Complicity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 09:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=2171#comment-62503</guid>
		<description>[...] start with the usual rant: Transsexual is an adjective, not a noun. The interview was littered with the interviewer committing the usual crime of referring to Chloë [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] start with the usual rant: Transsexual is an adjective, not a noun. The interview was littered with the interviewer committing the usual crime of referring to Chloë [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Wanted: pre-op transsexual&#8221;. Also required: clue? by &#8220;Hit and Miss&#8221;: Clue still required &#171; Complicity</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2011/01/hit-or-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-62501</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Hit and Miss&#8221;: Clue still required &#171; Complicity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 09:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=1024#comment-62501</guid>
		<description>[...] on yesterday&#8217;s Woman&#8217;s Hour (It&#8217;s right at the start) I think I have to stand by my first view that the production company are seriously lacking in clue, as shown by the fact that their initial casting call was for a pre-op trans woman. (The pre-op bit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on yesterday&#8217;s Woman&#8217;s Hour (It&#8217;s right at the start) I think I have to stand by my first view that the production company are seriously lacking in clue, as shown by the fact that their initial casting call was for a pre-op trans woman. (The pre-op bit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking Allowed on Transgender issues&#8230; by Sarah Lambert</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2012/05/thinking-allowed-transgender/comment-page-1/#comment-62178</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 21:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=2171#comment-62178</guid>
		<description>Zoe may not have said it directly but I will. 

Using transsexual as a noun (as in &quot;A transsexual lives in my street.&quot;) is objectionable to me as a transsexual woman.

Dictionaries, or people personally unaffected by the use of the term do not get to decide whether or not it is offensive. Transsexual people do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoe may not have said it directly but I will. </p>
<p>Using transsexual as a noun (as in &#8220;A transsexual lives in my street.&#8221;) is objectionable to me as a transsexual woman.</p>
<p>Dictionaries, or people personally unaffected by the use of the term do not get to decide whether or not it is offensive. Transsexual people do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communications Interception: LibDem party view, round two by Top of the Blogs: The Lib Dem Golden Dozen #273</title>
		<link>http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/2012/05/communications-interception-libdem-party-view/comment-page-1/#comment-62153</link>
		<dc:creator>Top of the Blogs: The Lib Dem Golden Dozen #273</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 18:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.complicity.co.uk/blog/?p=2170#comment-62153</guid>
		<description>[...] Communications Interception: LibDem party view, round two by Zoe O&#8217;Connell on Complicity. &#8220;&#8230;Julian Huppert very much Gets It, and if he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Communications Interception: LibDem party view, round two by Zoe O&#8217;Connell on Complicity. &#8220;&#8230;Julian Huppert very much Gets It, and if he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

